1887

Mycobacterial protocol for cats

In the UK, the majority of mycobacterial infections in cats are caused by tuberculous mycobacteria. The only large culture study showed ~35% of infections to be caused by (~20%) or (~15%) (Gunn-Moore , 2011ab), with ~50% of case submissions failing to grow. The most common non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are in the complex (MAC), and a wide range of NTM can infect cats.

It is important to consider the factors below before undertaking treatment:

  • – especially for the species of the tuberculosis (TB) complex group. All members of the affected cat’s household must be considered and it is important to determine any potentially immunosuppressed individuals (e.g. people with human immunodeficiency virus or who are undergoing chemotherapy). Treatment should be thoroughly considered where such individuals may be exposed, especially if the affected cat has generalized disease, cavitating lesions within the respiratory tract or extensive draining cutaneous lesions as these may increase the risk of transmission
  • – this can be difficult to maintain if the patient is non-compliant, due to the inherent toxicity of some of the drugs and the financial costs involved. In some cases, the drugs may at best suppress disease and indefinite treatment may be required (Sieber-Ruckstuhl , 2007; Greene and Gunn-Moore, 2011). Uncomplicated cutaneous cases with or without diffuse pulmonary changes carry the most favourable prognosis; treatment is successful in over 80% of cases. Placement of a feeding tube may be required to improve compliance with medications
  • – pending a definitive diagnosis, interim therapy with a fluoroquinolone is recommended in cases of localized cutaneous infection (Gunn-Moore , 2010).

Pradofloxacin (or moxifloxacin) is recommended as it is more effective against mycobacteria than the older fluoroquinolones, such as marbofloxacin (Govendir , 2011). With more extensive disease, the addition of azithromycin is indicated, pending confirmation, and rifampin should be added when TB is confirmed.

Previously, anti-TB treatment was given in an initial and then a continuation phase (Greene and Gunn-Moore, 2011). It is now known that it is better to give all three drugs for 4–6 months, depending on the extent of disease, and always for at least 2 months following complete resolution of the lesions. Extensive clinical experience supports using rifampin, pradofloxacin and azithromycin as a starting point; however, NTM infections may need different combinations.

Potentially useful drugs for the treatment of feline mycobacterial disease are given in the table below.

Drug Uses Dose Effects of toxicity

Pradofloxacin

First-line treatment for TB, NTM

5–7.5 mg/kg p.o. q24h

Reversible neutropenia (rare in the cat), seizures in cats with pre-existing CNS disease

Rifampin

First-line treatment for TB, MAC, NTM

10–15 mg/kg p.o. q24h

Side effects in ~20% of cases, with severe side effects in ~5%. Poor palatability, nausea, discoloration of body fluids, generalized erythema and pruritus, hyperaesthesia, CNS signs, hepatotoxicity, anaphylaxis, teratogenesis

Azithromycin

First-line treatment for TB, MAC, FLS, NTM

10–15 mg/kg p.o. q24h

Possible GI signs

Clarithromycin

First-line treatment for TB, MAC, FLS, NTM

7–15 mg/kg p.o. q12h

Possible GI signs

Isoniazid

Second-line treatment for TB

10–20 mg/kg p.o. q24h

Hepatotoxicity, peripheral neuritis, seizures, acute renal failure

Ethambutol

Second-line treatment for TB, NTM

10–25 mg/kg p.o. q24h

Optic neuritis

Pyrazinamide

Second-line treatment for TB

15–40 mg/kg p.o. q24h

Hepatotoxicity, GI signs

Dihydrostreptomycin

Second-line treatment for TB

15 mg/kg i.m. q24h

Ototoxicity

Clofazimine

Treatment for FLS, NTM

4–8 mg/kg (max 25 mg total) p.o. q24–48h

Hepatotoxicity, GI signs, discoloration of body fluids, photosensitization, pitting corneal lesions

Doxycycline

Second-line treatment for NTM, MAC

5–10 mg/kg p.o. q12–24h

GI signs, oesophagitis

Amikacin

Second-line treatment for NTM, MAC

10–15 mg/kg i.v., i.m., s.c. q24h

Nephrotoxic, ototoxic

Cefoxitin

Second-line treatment for NTM, MAC

20–30 mg/kg i.v., i.m., s.c. q6–8h

Pain on i.m., s.c. injection

FLS = feline leprosy syndrome; MAC = complex; NTM = non-tuberculous mycobacteria; TB = tuberculosis; = use enrofloxacin in the cat if at all avoidable as it has been associated with retinal degeneration; = these drugs may cause potentially serious side effects (e.g. hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity) – it is advisable to monitor use closely, including routine haematology and serum biochemistry 2 weeks after starting treatment and again following any change in the cat’s demeanour; = MAC infections can have inducible resistance genes to macrolides, meaning they appear susceptible but are resistant – where possible (limited by GI signs), use higher doses to reduce the risk of resistance; = particularly useful when treating MAC infections; = not effective against infection; = can be difficult to obtain; = give with food or give water after the medication to avoid oesophageal injury (alternatively, use monohydrate over hyclate formulations).

At a minimum, use of a fluoroquinolone is suggested while waiting for polymerase chain reaction or culture and susceptibility results. The new fluoroquinolones (e.g. pradofloxacin or moxifloxacin) are recommended as they have an extended spectrum of activity, which includes some NTM, and they are even effective against MAC infections (Govendir , 2011). MAC infections are particularly difficult to treat (Jordan , 1994).

Clarithromycin or azithromycin should be included (Piersimoni , 1995), ideally in combination with rifampin (Tomioka , 2002) ± another antibiotic according to culture and susceptibility testing, such as doxycycline (Baral , 2006) or, from human studies, ethambutol (Esteban , 2012).

Pyogranulomatous panniculitis usually requires long-term antibiotics prior to considering surgical management such as reconstructive surgery. Non-surgical cases may require double or triple therapy.

Feline leprosy-type infections (feline leprosy syndrome; FLS) can usually be treated with surgical removal of small nodules, which may be curative. Where medical management is needed, clarithromycin, pradofloxacin and rifampin or clofazimine are recommended.

Doxycycline, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides may also be useful (Mundell 1988; Malik , 2002, 2006a, 2013; Courtin , 2007). Dapsone is considered too toxic for use in cats (Hamanda , 1991) and is antagonistic to clofazimine. Treatment should be continued until the lesions have completely resolved, and ideally for a further 2–3 months to reduce the risk of recurrence; however, some cases require life-long clarithromycin to prevent recurrence (Malik , 2013).

Mycobacterial species Susceptibility Generally resistant

Clarithromycin, rifampin, doxycycline, ethambutol, pradofloxacin, clofazimine, amikacin

Recommended: clarithromycin or azithromycin + rifampin + another drug

Older fluoroquinolones, cefovecin

Potentially inadvisable to give just a new fluoroquinolone + clarithromycin or azithromycin

Amikacin (100%), cefoxitin (94%), ciprofloxacin (75%), clarithromycin (71% ), pradofloxacin, clofazimine

Recommended: azithromycin or clarithromycin + another drug

Many oral medications, including doxycycline + older fluoroquinolones

Do not give pradofloxacin or moxifloxacin with azithromycin or clarithromycin

Recommended: pradofloxacin

+ amikacin (100%), cefoxitin (94%), older fluoroquinolones (75%), clarithromycin (~75%), clofazimine, rifampin, gentamicin or doxycycline (29% )

Trimethoprim ± sulphonamide, cefovecin, clarithromycin

Fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, gentamicin, trimethoprim ± sulphonamide, clofazimine

Recommended: pradofloxacin + doxycycline

Clarithromycin, cefovecin

Fluoroquinolones, clarithromycin, rifampin, clofazimine

Rifampin, clarithromycin, fluoroquinolones, amikacin, clofazimine

Rifampin, doxycycline, clarithromycin

Clarithromycin, azithromycin, ethambutol

Clarithromycin, fluoroquinolones, ethambutol

Data from Studdert and Hughes, 1992; Malik , 1994, 2000, 2004, 2006ab; Michaud, 1994; Kiehn , 1996; Foster , 1999; Smith , 2000; Jang and Hirsh, 2002; Tomioka , 2002; Dietrich , 2003; Govendir , 2011; Cho , 2012; van Ingen , 2012; Bennie , 2014. = Other studies have shown these drugs to be either more or less effective.

Cats may suffer side effects while receiving treatment for mycobacterial infections, especially with rifampin. While side effects can be concerning to owners and veterinary professionals, this drug is essential for optimizing the outcome of cats with TB and is the only drug in the triple therapy approach with activity against non-replicating bacteria.

To help manage dermatological side effects such as pruritus, antihistamines can be used. Chlorphenamine therapy has been reported but the ideal dose and interval is unknown and efficacy is not established clinically. Focal pruritic lesions can also be managed with topical hydrocortisone aceponate spray.

Hepatotoxicity is another possible side effect of rifampin, which may manifest clinically as hyporexia, nausea or vomiting, or may be identified with increased enzyme activities on serum biochemistry. -Adenosylmethionine (20 mg/kg p.o. q24h) is a widely used hepatoprotective agent in cases of drug-induced liver toxicity. An intriguing alternative agent is -acetylcysteine (NAC) (600 mg/cat p.o. q12h); while pharmacological data are lacking for its use in cats, it is safe and well tolerated. NAC has an unpleasant taste and smell, so giving whole capsules is usually advised. Nausea and vomiting are potential side effects, and drooling occurs when the capsule content is mixed with too little food. Since NAC can cause bronchial spasm, it should be used with caution in animals with asthma. NAC helps to restore blood glutathione concentrations, and thus antioxidant capacity. It has also been shown to reduce bacterial counts and the severity of lesions.

Restoration of antioxidant capacity helps reduce the toxic side effects of anti-TB drugs such as rifampin and isoniazid, which are mediated by oxidant-driven damage to the liver. Short-term studies have also shown that NAC has some direct antimycobacterial activity and can reduce growth of bacteria both and .

Baral RM, Metcalfe SS, Krockenberger MB (2006) Disseminated infection in young cats: overrepresentation of Abyssinian cats. , 23–44

Bennett AD, Lalor S, Schwarz T and Gunn-Moore DA (2011) Radiographic findings in cats with mycobacterial infections. , 718–724

Bennie C, To J, Martin P and Govendir M (2015) interaction of some drug combinations to inhibit rapidly growing mycobacteria isolates from cats and dogs and these isolates’ susceptibility to cefovecin and clofazimine. , 40–45

Cho JH, Yu CH, Jin MK (2012) pericarditis in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report and comprehensive review of the literature. , E50–E55

Courtin F, Huerre M, Fyfe J, Dumas P and Boschiroli ML (2007) A case of feline leprosy caused by originating from the island of Kythira (Greece): diagnosis and treatment. , 238–241

Dietrich U, Arnold P, Guscetti F, Pfyffer GE and Spiess B (2003) Ocular manifestation of disseminated infection in a cat. , 121–125

Esteban J, García-Pedrazuela M, Muñoz-Egea MC and Alcaide F (2012) Current treatment of nontuberculous mycobacteriosis: an update. , 967–986

Foster SF, Martin P, Davis W (1999) Chronic pneumonia caused by in a cat. , 433–438

Gelatt KN, van der Woerdt A, Ketring KL (2001) Enrofloxacin-associated retinal degeneration in cats. , 99–106

Govendir M, Norris JM, Hansen T (2011) Susceptibility of rapidly growing mycobacteria and isolates from cats and dogs to pradofloxacin. , 240–245

Greene CE and Gunn-Moore DA (2011) Mycobacterial Infections. In: , ed. J Sykes and CE Greene, pp. 495–510. Saunders, Philadelphia

Gunn-Moore DA (2010) Mycobacterial infections in cats and dogs. In: , ed. SJ Ettinger and EC Feldman, pp. 875–881. Saunders, Philadelphia

Gunn-Moore DA, McFarland SE, Brewer JI (2011a) Mycobacterial disease in cats in Great Britain: 1 bacterial species, geographical distribution and clinical presentation of 339 cases. , 934–944

Gunn-Moore DA, McFarland SE, Brewer JI (2011b) Mycobacterial disease in cats in Great Britain: 2 histopathology, treatment and outcome of 339 cases. , 945–952

Hamada K, Hiyoshi T, Kobayashi S (1991) Anticonvulsive effect of dapsone (4,4’-diaminodiphenyl sulfone) on amygdala-kindled seizures in rats and cats. , 93–102

Jang SS and Hirsh DC (2002) Rapidly growing members of the genus affecting dogs and cats. , 217–220

Jordan HL, Cohn LA and Armstrong PJ (1994) Disseminated complex infection in three Siamese cats. , 90–93

Kaufman AC, Green CE, Rakich PM and Weigner DD (1995) Treatment of localized complex infection with clofazimine and doxycycline in a cat. , 457–459

Kiehn TE, Hoefer H, Bottger EC (1996) infections in pet animals. , 1840–1842

Malik R, Hughes MS, James G (2002) Feline leprosy: two different clinical syndromes. , 43–59

Malik R, Hughes MS, Martin P and Wigney D (2006a) Feline leprosy syndromes. In: , ed. CE Greene, pp. 477–480. Saunders, Philadelphia

Malik R, Hunt GB, Goldsmid SE (1994) Diagnosis and treatment of pyogranulomatous panniculitis due to in cats. , 524–530

Malik R, Martin P, Wigney D and Foster S (2006b) Infections caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria. In: , ed. CE Greene, pp. 482–488. Saunders, Philadelphia

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error