1887

Disturbances of growth and bone development

image of Disturbances of growth and bone development
GBP
Online Access: £ 25.00 + VAT
BSAVA Library Pass Buy a pass

Abstract

Problems affecting bone growth and development are caused by abnormalities of cartilage formation, cartilage transformation, or bone formation. This chapter covers angular limb deformities and bone dysplasias in depth. : Distal ulnar osteotomy/segmental ostectomy; Radial and ulnar corrective osteotomies; Dynamic lengthening of the radius using an external skeletal fixator; Tibial osteotomy for tarsal varus or valgus.

Preview this chapter:
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/chapter/10.22233/9781910443286.chap8

Figures

Image of 8.3
8.3 Example of CORA calculation for frontal plane antebrachial angular limb deformity; two centres of rotation angulation deformities are identified and illustrated. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.4
8.4 Osteotomies and ostectomies. (a) Transverse osteotomy. (b) Opening wedge osteotomy. (c) Closing wedge after cuneiform osteotomy. (d) Oblique osteotomy. (e) Segmental osteotomy. (f) Dome osteotomy. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.6
8.6 The importance of preoperative planning. (a) An osteotomy performed at the level of maximal deformity results in a very small epiphyseal fragment in the distal tibia. (b) A small epiphyseal fragment can be difficult to stabilize adequately. (c) Making the cut proximal to the level of maximal deformity results in a larger piece of bone that is easier to stabilize. (d) When reduced, the bone in (c) will not be straight; however, this is not usually a problem as long as the joints are parallel. (e–f) Making the cut too far from the point of maximal deformity will cause a significant deformity of the bone once reduced. (g–h) Centring a dome osteotomy away from the point of deformity will correct the angular limb deformity but induce a translational deformity. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.7
8.7 (a) A 6-month-old Irish Wolfhound with bilateral carpal valgus secondary to metaphyseal osteopathy. (b) Mediolateral radiograph of the antebrachium of a 7-month-old Irish Wolfhound with radius curvus and a retained cartilaginous core in the distal ulna.
Image of 8.8
8.8 Changes associated with retarded growth of the distal ulnar growth plate (radius curvus). Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.9
8.9 (a) Mediolateral view of the thoracic limb of a Great Dane with carpal valgus, showing premature closure of the distal ulnar growth plate and radius curvus but no elbow joint subluxation. (b) Mediolateral view of the thoracic limb of a Bassett Hound with carpal valgus, showing premature closure of the distal ulnar growth plate, radius curvus and humeroulnar subluxation. The dog also had panosteitis.
Image of 8.11
8.11 (a) Craniocaudal and (b) mediolateral views of a 9-month-old Cavalier King Charles Spaniel with premature closure of the distal radial growth plate. The radius has lost its normal cranial bowing, there is a marked humeroradial subluxation and secondary humeroulnar subluxation. There is no significant angular deformity.
Image of 8.12
8.12 (a) Mediolateral and (b) craniocaudal views of a 5-month-old crossbreed dog with partial closure of the caudolateral aspect of the distal radial growth plate, combined with an abnormal appearance of the distal ulnar growth plate probably associated with delayed growth. There is humeroradial and humeroulnar subluxation. The radius has lost its normal cranial bow and has a straight appearance. There is a carpal valgoid deformity induced by the partial growth plate closure.
Image of 8.13
8.13 Imaging changes seen with premature closure of the distal radial physis. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.14
8.14 Synostosis (arrowed) between the radius and ulna in a 6-month-old Pointer after a mid-diaphyseal fracture was stabilized with external skeletal fixation. Continued growth of the proximal radial growth plate in this immature dog could result in humeroulnar subluxation.
Image of 8.15
8.15 (a) An adult Dachshund with marked bilateral pes varus and (b) a 3D volume rendered image from the same dog illustrating the severity of the deformity. (Courtesy of Gordon Brown)
Image of 8.16
8.16 Radiograph of a Shetland Sheepdog with a valgoid deformity of the tibia. The deformity developed subsequent to premature closure of the distal fibular growth plate, either alone or combined with partial closure of the lateral aspect of the distal tibial growth plate.
Image of 8.17
8.17 Lateral radiograph of the stifle of a kitten with genu recurvatum. (Courtesy of Matthew Pead)
Image of 8.19
8.19 Osteochondrodysplastic dwarfism in a crossbreed dog. The dog has marked curvature of the antebrachium with cubital varus, carpal valgus and external rotation of the foot. The pelvic limbs are relatively straight.
Image of 8.20
8.20 (a) CT 3D volume rendered image showing a caudally directed osteochondroma of the distal radius in a 1-year-old Deerhound with lameness due to impingement of the flexor tendons. (b) An intraoperative image showing removal of the lesion in the same dog. (Courtesy of Gordon Brown)
Image of 8.21
8.21 Radiograph of the elbow of a Burmese cat with an osteochondroma. The cat was sound for 6 months after local excision; however, the lesion recurred and a sarcoma developed. Amputation was curative.
Image of 8.22
8.22 Osteogenesis imperfecta in an 11-month-old cat that presented with a tibial fracture. Radiographs showed (a) the presence of healed fractures in the same bone (and in the opposite tibia). (b) The cat suffered spontaneous bilateral humeral fractures while being caged during hospitalization. Bone density in this cat was not grossly reduced radiographically.
Image of 8.23
8.23 Osteopetrosis. This 1-year-old entire male Bulldog presented because of lameness secondary to hip dysplasia. (Courtesy of George Papadopoulos)
Image of 8.24
8.24 Partial fusion of the fifth and sixth lumbar vertebrae. Block vertebrae are examples of axial dysostoses and are often incidental findings.
Image of 8.25
8.25 Ectrodactyly in a dog with associated elbow deformity and luxation. (Courtesy of John Innes)
Image of 8.26
8.26 Cervical spine, skull and shoulder of a cat with mucopolysaccharidosis. There is vertebral fusion, with widened intervertebral disc spaces and abnormally shaped vertebral bodies. The shoulder joint shows irregular bone proliferation on the humeral head.
Image of 8.27
8.27 A 6-month-old German Shepherd Dog with pituitary dwarfism. The dog is a proportionate dwarf with a retained puppy coat and ‘rat tail’.
Image of 8.28
8.28 (a) Positioning and site of surgical incision. (b) Hohmann retractors are used to retract muscles prior to cutting the ulna. (c) When performing a segmental ulnar ostectomy, the length of ulna resected should be approximately 1.5 times the diameter of the bone. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.29
8.29 (a) Illustration of segmental distal ulnar ostectomy and (b) radiograph of procedure performed to address short ulna syndrome with elbow incongruence. (b, courtesy of Dr. Catharina Arthurs)
Image of 8.30
8.30 The lining technique for calculating the point of maximal deformity and the size of the cuneiform (wedge) ostectomy. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.31
8.31 The bisection technique for calculating the point of maximal deformity and the size of the cuneiform (wedge) ostectomy. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.32
8.32 A bilateral (type II) ESF has been used to stabilize the antebrachium after a corrective closing wedge ostectomy. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.33
8.33 (a–b) Immediate postoperative radiographs following corrective radial and ulnar ostectomies showing cranial and medial radial plates, with a K-wire used for intraoperative stabilization.
Image of 8.34
8.34 (a) Border Collie with carpal valgus subsequent to a distal radial fracture and a Salter–Harris type V closure of the distal ulnar growth plate. (b) A bilateral ESF has been applied after a closing wedge ostectomy to correct the carpal valgus. The ostectomy was performed more proximally than the true point of maximal deformity, to give a large enough distal piece of the bone to stabilize. This has resulted in a slight bow to the antebrachium; however, the foot and humerus are in line and the elbow and carpal joints are parallel, so the antebrachial deformity should not cause a problem.
Image of 8.35
8.35 An intraoperative view of the radius being exposed prior to osteotomy.
Image of 8.36
8.36 Diagrams showing a type IIB ESF applied to the radius to achieve radial lengthening. Note the distraction of the proximal radial segment, lengthening of the radial osteotomy gap, and proximal translation of the radial head to a more normal position relative to the ulnar trochlea. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.37
8.37 Correction of short radius with a mid-radial osteotomy and dynamic lengthening using a circular ESF. (a) Immediately postoperatively: note the radial osteotomy, radiohumeral and humeroulnar incongruence, and circular ESF in place. (b) Three weeks postoperatively: note the distracted radial gap with early mineralization and improved radiohumeral congruency. (c) Seven weeks postoperatively: note the improved radiohumeral congruency and mature bridging of the radial osteotomy; the circular ESF was removed at this point.
Image of 8.38
8.38 Application of the lining method for determining the point of maximal deformity and size of wedge required in order to straighten the tibia.
Image of 8.39
8.39 Application of the bisection technique for determining the point of maximal deformity and size of wedge required in order to straighten the tibia. Dots indicate the midpoint of the tibia and tarsus, and the dotted line connects these bisection points to define the long axis of the tibia and tarsus respectively.
Image of 8.40
8.40 A bilateral ESF has been applied with three half pins medially after closing wedge ostectomy for tarsal valgus correction. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission.
Image of 8.41
8.41 Opening wedge osteotomy for pes varus in a Dachschund. Drawn by S.J. Elmhurst BA Hons (www.livingart.org.uk) and reproduced with her permission. (Modified from , with permission)
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error